|
Year |
Event |
|
1630 |
First bounty - settlers in Mass. Bay
Colony passed laws offering cash reward to any resident that killed a
wolf. Other colonies followed. |
|
1644-45 |
Any Mass. Indian could get 3qt. of wine
or a bushel of corn for one wolf. |
|
1818 |
"War of Extermination" in Ohio declared
against bear and wolves. |
|
1838 |
Bounty system started in Michigan.
|
|
1843 |
Bounty system started in early Texas
and Colorado. |
|
1849 |
Bounty system started in Minnesota.
First bounty was $3. |
|
1850-80 |
Era of the "Wolfers" Demand for wolf
pelts increased as a result of beaver population decimation. Wolfers
preferred poison to traps and killed bison, elk and other animals for
bait. It is estimated that 100.000 wolves were killed a year between
1870 and 1877. |
|
1858 |
Bounty system started in Iowa. |
|
1865 |
Bounty system started in Wisconsin.
First bounty was $5. |
|
1869 |
Bounty system started in established
Colorado. |
|
1872 |
Yellowstone National Park (YNP) created
protecting wildlife from "wanton destruction." Ungulate slaughter for
use in predator poisoning continues. |
|
1875 |
Bounty system started in Wyoming. |
|
1884 |
Bounty system started in Montana. |
|
1900 |
At the turn of the century wolves were
rare in southern and western Minnesota, southern Wisconsin and Michigan,
and all of the eastern U.S. |
|
1905 |
Elk used as livestock guarding animals
for sheep in Arkansas. |
|
1913 |
Law in Wyoming stipulated penalty of
$300 for freeing a wolf from a trap. |
|
1914 |
The U.S. Government provided poison and
personnel in an attempt to rid its U.S. of the remaining wolves.
|
|
|
YNP wolf extirpation begins. |
|
1922 - 1935 |
State trapping system created in
Michigan. Bounty stopped during this period but reinstated in 1935. |
|
1930 |
150 wolves estimated to inhabit
Wisconsin. |
|
1940's |
Wolves arrived on Isle Royale,
Michigan. |
|
1950 |
It was estimated that only 50 wolves
remained in extreme northern Wisconsin. |
|
1950 - 1952 |
It was estimated there were 450-700
wolves in northern Minnesota and an average of 253 wolves were taken
annually under the state's bounty system. |
|
1956 |
Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) ended a wolf control program that included aerial
shooting. About 190 wolves had been taken by various methods each year
since 1953. |
|
1957 |
The bounty system ended in Wisconsin
and wolves became totally protected under state law. |
|
1958 |
Formal monitoring program for wolves on
Isle Royale began. |
|
1953 - 1959 |
The number of wolves taken by bounty in
Minnesota ranged from 122 to 252 annually (average 189). |
|
1960 |
Wolves considered extirpated from
Wisconsin. |
|
|
Bounty system repealed in Michigan. The
number of wolves bountied in the state had been decreasing: 1956 = 30,
1958 = 7, and only 1 in 1959. |
|
1960s |
This was considered by many to be the
low point for wolf numbers in the lower 48 states. The only remaining
wolves were in extreme northeastern Minnesota (350-700) and on Isle
Royale (about 20). |
|
1963 |
There were an estimated 20 wolves on
Isle Royale. |
|
1960 - 1965 |
171-211 wolves had been submitted for
bounty each year in Minnesota. |
|
1965 |
Michigan gave the wolf complete protection under state law. |
|
|
Last bounty ($35) was paid on a wolf in
Minnesota. |
|
|
The eastern timber wolf was thought to
occur in only 3% of its former range in the US outside of Alaska.
|
|
1966 - 1973 |
Around 200 wolves were harvested
annually in Minnesota. |
|
1967 |
The eastern timber wolf was listed as
"endangered' in the contiguous US under a 1966 federal Endangered
Species Preservation Act. This act only provided limited protection on
federal lands. |
|
1969 - 1974 |
Minnesota DNR conducted a Directed
Predator Control Program and an average of 64 wolves were killed
annually for depredating on livestock. The program provided a $50
incentive to designated trappers taking wolves in certain areas.
|
|
1970 |
The Superior National Forest
(Minnesota) was closed to the taking of wolves on federal land. Private
and state lands, including frozen lake surfaces inside and outside of
the forest, were still open to wolf harvest. |
|
|
There were an estimated 750 wolves in
Minnesota, no wolves in Wisconsin, possibly scattered individuals in the
Upper Peninsula of Michigan, and 18 wolves on Isle Royale. |
|
1973 |
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) was
enacted into law by the US Congress. |
|
1974 |
Four wolves were captured in Minnesota
and released in Michigan's Upper Peninsula by the US Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS). The reintroduction failed due to human-caused mortality
to the wolves. |
|
|
Public harvest of wolves in Minnesota
ended. |
|
|
In August the eastern timber wolf
became legally protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
|
|
1975 |
The first documented reproducing pack
of wolves in Wisconsin since the 1950s prompted the state to list the
eastern timber wolf as a state endangered species. |
|
|
A joint team of Federal and State
personnel and biologists devise a Wolf Recovery Plan for Minnesota
wolves. |
|
|
The USFWS initiated a program to
control wolf depredations in Minnesota. The program involved moving
wolves from areas where wolves had killed livestock. |
|
1976 |
The Mexican gray wolf subspecies was
listed under the Endangered Species Act. |
|
1978 |
Minnesota Legislature enacted a state
compensation program to pay livestock owners for losses from wolf
depredation. |
|
|
The Eastern Timber Wolf Recovery Plan
was published. It called for 5 wolf management zones in Minnesota, the
reestablishment of wolves elsewhere, a limited public harvest in
Minnesota, and reclassification from endangered to threatened in
Minnesota. |
|
|
Minnesota wolves were reclassified from endangered to threatened. This
change allowed the USFWS to kill wolves in areas where wolves had killed
livestock. |
|
1977-80 |
The last five wild, Mexican wolves
thought to be remaining were captured in Mexico and placed in captivity
to establish a captive breeding program. |
|
1979 |
Wisconsin began intensive monitoring of wolves and estimated there were
25 wolves in the state during the winter of 1979-80. |
|
1980 |
Minnesota DNR prepared a wolf
management plan and proposed taking wolf management back from the USFWS.
The government turned down the proposal. |
|
|
5 wolf packs were found in Wisconsin.
50 wolves were on Isle Royale, Michigan. |
|
1980s |
Canine parvovirus became wide spread in
the Lake States region. It is later suspected that parvo caused a
drastic decline in the wolf population on Isle Royale and possibly
throughout the region. |
|
1982 |
The Mexican wolf recovery plan is
completed with goals to maintain a captive breeding program and
re-establish a population of 100 wolves within their historic range. |
|
1983 |
The USFWS recommended that trappers in
Minnesota be allowed to take 50 wolves to supplement the depredation
control program and that the control program be handed over to the
state. |
|
1984 |
A court order prohibited the proposed
trapper harvest of wolves in Minnesota. The USFWS retained management
authority. |
|
1986 |
Federal wolf depredation activities
transferred from the USFWS to the Department of Agriculture, Animal
Damage Control (now Wildlife Services). |
|
|
Wisconsin DNR created a Wolf Recovery
Team to develop a state wolf recovery plan. |
|
1987 |
Wisconsin closed coyote hunting during the state's deer gun season in
the northern portion of the state to reduce the number of wolves killed
mistakenly. |
|
1988 |
12 Wolves on Isle Royale. |
|
1988 - 1989 |
Minnesota DNR estimated that there were
between 1500 and 1750 wolves in 233 packs in the state and the state's
wolf range was estimated at about 25,000 square miles. |
|
1989 |
Wisconsin Wolf Recovery Plan initiated.
A goal of 80 wolves in 10 packs for 3 years was set. Down listing was to
occur when this goal was met. |
|
1990 |
A long range plan by Minnesota DNR
called for: maintaining at least 1000 to 1200 wolves through 1992;
expanding recreational use and understanding of wolves; and assisting
other states in establishing wolf populations. |
|
1991 |
The first documented observation of
wolves reproducing in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan since the 1950's.
Michigan wolf population estimated at 17. |
|
1985 - 1992 |
A series of studies suggested that
human-caused wolf mortality, as indexed by road density and thus human
access, was the primary factor limiting the distribution and abundance
of wolves in the Great Lakes region. |
|
1992 |
The Eastern Timber Wolf Recovery Plan
was updated. Minnesota estimated the state wolf population at 1500 -1750
animals; Wisconsin estimated 45; and Michigan estimated 21 with another
12 on Isle Royale. |
|
|
Michigan formed a wolf recovery team and later published a recovery
plan. |
|
|
Wisconsin Wolf Advisory Committee was
formed to oversee wolf recovery and develop a wolf management plan which
included criteria for reclassification. |
|
1994 |
Wisconsin and Michigan estimated they had 57 wolves each. Their combined
estimates of over 100 wolves outside of Minnesota started the 5 year
count down to delisting the eastern timber wolf as suggested in the 1992
Recovery Plan. |
|
1995 |
Wisconsin and Michigan estimated their populations at 83 and 80
respectively. Both states started the 3 year count down towards state
reclassification. |
|
1996 |
The USFWS published their Vertebrate
Population Policy which stated that existing populations can no longer
be listed, reclassified, or delisted by political (for example state)
boundaries. |
|
|
Minnesota estimated there were between 2,000 and 2,200 wolves in the
state. Wisconsin estimated their population at 99 wolves and Michigan
estimated they had 116 wolves. |
|
|
Wisconsin Wolf Advisory Committee began
developing a new wolf management plan. |
|
1996 |
USFWS releases final environmental
impact statement for Mexican gray wolf recovery. |
|
1997 |
In November, the Minnesota DNR began a
repeat of its 1988-89 extensive survey of wolf distribution and
abundance in the state. Wisconsin population was 145. |
|
|
Michigan DNR released its wolf recovery
and management plan. |
|
|
Michigan DNR estimated that there were
112 wolves in at least 20 packs in Michigan's Upper Peninsula and 24
wolves in 3 packs on Isle Royale. |
|
1997 |
Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt rules
in favor of USFWS reintroducing captive-raised Mexican gray wolves in
eastern Arizona within the Blue Range Wolf Recovery Area; designates
released wolves and their offspring as a nonessential population. |
|
1998 |
Minnesota DNR estimated that there were
2,450 wolves in Minnesota during the winter of 1997-98, and that the
wolf range was around 88,325 square kilometers. |
|
|
It was estimated that there were 178
wolves in Wisconsin and 140 in Michigan with an additional 14 on Isle
Royale. |
|
|
Minnesota DNR held a series of public
information meetings around the state to discuss the future of wolves in
the state. |
|
|
US Interior Secretary, Bruce Babbitt,
announced intentions to begin plans to remove the wolf from the
endangered species list in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan. |
|
|
DNR organized a 32-member roundtable
group composed of people from all sides of the wolf issue. They produced
a recommendation for wolf management. These recommendations were used by
the Minnesota DNR as they formed their wolf management plan. |
|
|
USFWS releases first captive-reared
Mexican wolves into the wild. |
|
|
New Mexico Cattle Growers Association
sues USFWS, alleging violations of federal laws in implementing the
Mexican wolf reintroduction project. |
|
1999 |
Wisconsin DNR released its wolf
management plan. |
|
|
Wisconsin reclassifies the wolf from a state listed endangered species
to a state listed threatened species because the goal of 80 wolves had
been maintained since 1995. |
|
|
The Minnesota Legislature failed to
pass the roundtable's wolf management plan suggested by the Minnesota
DNR. |
|
|
Steven Kellert of Yale University
completed a study of public attitudes towards wolves in Minnesota. |
|
|
Wisconsin and Michigan estimate that they have 205 and 174 wolves
respectively, with an additional 25 on Isle Royale. |
|
|
Courts rule USFWS complied with laws in
New Mexico Cattle Growers Assoc lawsuit; lawsuit dismissed. |
|
2000 |
Minnesota DNR proposed a modified
version of the roundtable's wolf management plan. |
|
|
Minnesota Legislature passes a bill
containing an outline for wolf management in Minnesota. |
|
|
A group of environmental and wolf
advocate organizations filed a lawsuit claiming the wolf management bill
for Minnesota was passed through an illegal method of "log-rolling."
|
|
|
Wisconsin and Michigan estimate that they have 266 and 216 wolves
respectively, with an additional 29 on Isle Royale. |
|
2001 |
A Ramsey County judge dismissed the
lawsuit that claimed that the Minnesota state wolf management bill was
passed through an illegal method of "log-rolling." |
|
|
Minnesota DNR sent its wolf management
plan to the USFWS for review. |
|
|
Wisconsin and Michigan estimate that they have 251and 249 wolves
respectively, with an additional 19 on Isle Royale. |
|
|
A wolf which was trapped and
radio-collared in Michigan in 1999 dispersed to Missouri, where it was
mistaken for a coyote and killed. |
|
|
4 wolves confirmed shot in Wisconsin
during the deer hunting season. |
|
|
Livestock depredations in Minnesota at
a 10 year low. |
|
|
Voyageurs National Park in Minnesota, lifts a ban on snowmobile use of
frozen bays within the park. 8 conservation and animal protection groups
filed suit in US District Court opposing the decision. |
|
|
USFWS completes three-year review of
Mexican wolf recovery project. Scientists recommend program continues
with no modifications. |
|
2002 |
Michigan reclassifies the wolf from state listed endangered species to a
state listed threatened species. |
|
|
Wisconsin and Michigan estimate that they have 320 and 280 wolves
respectively, with an additional 17 on Isle Royale. |
|
2003 |
USFWS reclassifies gray wolf
populations into three distinct population segments (DPSs): Eastern,
Western and Southwestern. The Eastern and Western DPSs are classified as
threatened and the Southwestern DPS is classified as endangered on the
Endangered Species List. |
|
|
Coalition of Arizona and New Mexico
counties files suit alleging USFWS failed to consider impacts of
hybridizatin or prepare supplemental environmental impact statement and
violated the Freedom of Information Act by withholding documents. |
|
2004 |
USFWS holds public hearings on the
proposal to delist the gray wolf in the Eastern DPS. |
|
|
Estimated wolf populations for MN, WI,
MI and Isle Royale are 3020, 400, 360 and 19 respectively. |
|
|
USFWS oversight committee cooperators
begin Blue Range Reintroduction Project five-year review; draft reports
released to public for review and comment in December. |
|
2005 |
(January 3) U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Regulation allows maximum management of gray wolves for the
states of Montana and Idaho. |
|
|
(January 31) US district judge rules
against the US Dept of Interior and FWS on their plan to remove the wolf
from the endangered species list. Federal classification returns to
status prior to April 2003. |
|
|
Courts rule in favor of USFWS in
lawsuit by Arizona and New Mexico counties; lawsuit dismissed. |
|
|
Adaptive Management Oversight Committee
completes Mexican Wolf Blue Range Reintroduction Project five-year
review, which includes 37 recommendations for improving management of
the wolf reintroduction project; many would require changes to 1997
rule. |
|
|
(December) Department of the Interior
declines to appeal the Oregon and Vermont rulings. |
|
2006 |
(January 5) Memorandum of Agreement
between Idaho and the U.S. Department of Interior signed by Gov. Dirk
Kempthorne and transferring authority for day-to-day wolf management to
the state as agent for the Fish and Wildlife Service under the revised
10(j) rule. |
|
|
(March) USFWS proposes to delist the
gray wolf population of the Western Great Lakes Distinct Population
Segment (WGL DPS). |
|
2007 |
Gray wolves in the WGL DPS are delisted
February 8. |
|
|
The final decision to delist the WGL
DPS becomes effective March 12. |
|
|
(June) The USFWS's post-delisting
five-year monitoring plan for the WGL DPS available for review and
comment. |
|
2008 |
(February 21) The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service filed the rule that would remove gray wolves in the
Northern Rocky Mountains from the federal endangered species list. |
|
|
(March 28) Delisting rule becomes final
and Idaho, Wyoming and Montana assume full responsibility for wolves
under state management. Fish and Wildlife would continue to monitor wolf
recovery for five years. |
|
|
(April 28) 12 conservation and animal
rights groups file a lawsuit in federal court challenging the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service's decision to remove the gray wolf in the Northern
Rocky Mountains from the endangered species list, and request a
preliminary injunction staying the delisting until the lawsuit is
settled. |
|
|
(May 22) Idaho Fish and Game Commission
adopts proposed wolf hunting seasons and rules for fall 2008. |
|
|
(July 18) Federal district judge issues
a preliminary injunction that returns wolves in Idaho to endangered
species protection and puts hunting seasons on hold. |
|
|
(September 17)
The federal
government withdraws the final rule that delisted wolves in the Northern
Rockies Distinct Population Segment earlier this year. |
|
|
(September 29) Federal district judge
vacates final rule to delist the gray wolf in the Great Lakes Area. |